The CAQ analyzed S&P 500 companies’ Form 10-Ks to understand the extent of climate-related disclosures in those SEC filings.
The CAQ, using data by ESGAUGE, looked at the most recent SEC Form 10-Ks for S&P 500 companies available as of June 2024.1 We analyzed 10-Ks from S&P 500 companies to understand what companies disclosed in their SEC filings about climate-related information, including
We compared the data with similar climate-related data gathered in prior years.
This analysis was solely focused on information disclosed in an S&P 500 company’s SEC Form 10-K, and does not contemplate climate-related information communicated by companies outside of their SEC Form 10-K.
The CAQ observed that most S&P 500 companies mentioned climate-related information in their 10-K. The number of S&P 500 companies mentioning climate-related information in their 10-K increased almost 4%, from 477 companies in 2022 to 494 companies in 2023.
From 2022 to 2023, we observed increases in companies disclosing climate-related information in Item 1A. Risk Factors, Item 1. Business, Item 7. MD&A and Item 8. Financial Statements. We noted the greatest percentage increases in the disclosure of climate-related information in Item 7. MD&A and Item 8. Financial Statements (more on that later). The majority of S&P 500 companies that mention climate-related information in their 10-K continued to do so in Item 1A. Risk Factors or Item 1. Business.
Similar to prior years, less common sections of Form 10-K where S&P 500 companies mentioned climate-related information included, Item 2. Properties, Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk, Item 3. Legal Proceedings, Item 11. Executive Compensation, and Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services.
Overall, we found that when disclosures in an S&P 500 company’s 10-K included mention of climate-related information, the types of information included in the climate-related disclosures varied from company to company.
Climate-related mentions in the financial statements roughly doubled from the prior year. While companies increased disclosures across a variety of footnotes, we observed the greatest increase in disclosures related to debt or borrowing arrangements.
Most mentions of climate-related information in Item 8. Financial Statements continued to fall within one of the following types of footnotes:
Examples of CAMs that mentioned climate-related matters
Long-lived Asset Impairments and Re-evaluation of Useful Lives:
“…auditing the Company’s identification of impairment indicators and re-evaluation of useful lives involved a high degree of subjectivity, particularly given the Company’s decarbonization initiatives and shift towards clean energy platforms.”
Regulatory Assets and Liabilities - Impact of Rate Regulation on the Consolidated Financial Statements:
“These analyses are generally based on … considerations around the likelihood of impacts from events such as unusual weather conditions, extreme weather events and other natural disasters, and unplanned outages of facilities.”
From 2022 to 2023, we observed an approximately 9% increase in the number of companies that mentioned scope 1, 2, or 3 GHG emissions, status, or objectives in their 10-K. Some S&P 500 companies that disclosed their scope 1, 2, or 3 emissions also provided quantitative GHG emissions information such as their actual carbon emissions for a period of time or their actual reductions in emissions.
For the first time this year, we looked at whether S&P 500 companies mentioned any ESG reporting standards and frameworks or any upcoming ESG reporting requirements, beyond the SEC Climate Rule, in their 10-Ks. We looked at whether the companies mentioned using any of the following ESG reporting standards and frameworks: Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB) Standards, Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) Standards, Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) Recommendations, Integrated Reporting Framework or the IFRS® Sustainability Disclosure Standards. We also looked at whether companies made any mention of the European Union Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (EU CSRD) or the California Climate Laws (SB 253, SB 261 or AB 1305). We observed the following:
Endnotes